Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
主题很棒，但其他一切都毫无逻辑性可言。明显主创团队对科技和商业毫无了解，只是单纯的凭臆想来讲故事。
虽然有影射苹果的赶脚，但是真的真的很感人啊~太棒了好嘛！科技改变了我们的交友方式，但是我想我们每个人还是终将需回归现实的。
7/10。糖豆人般的小白情感最纯粹，它碎片化的主体意识无法联接网络共享，却为巴尼联系朋友而满街张贴广告，用取暖模式躺在巴尼的床下，甚至因低电量进入睡眠时，依然用尽力量将昏迷的巴尼带出森林寻找救援，相比掌握科技的巨头利用数据库凝视用户的需求和信息，或是教师不合时宜地让巴尼去操场上的交友椅，几乎令其社死的教育他不能没有朋友，畸形的社交准则使得孤立者更加缺乏价值认同，这和没有添加朋友功能的小白被讥讽为一坨没用的塑料，具有较强的反思意味。小白令发明家找到初心的独立性，在于不靠执行命令来充当小孩的交友凭证，它能记住每一张墙贴纸上巴尼对友谊的定义，将灵魂化为编码，最终通过复制自我的数据重载云端，实现了人与机器萌宠注重彼此主体的互助模式。片中载着羊开车、讥讽独裁者和全身塞满刀子的俄国奶奶，算不算一种刻板印象？
这片子vs《超能陆战队》的关系，就跟《失控玩家》vs《头号玩家》+《乐高大电影》的关系一样，嚼烂了再recycle一遍，并且主题都是号召大家从虚拟世界中抽身出来回到现实生活，一个交朋友，一个谈恋爱，正确但没劲，而且是一种逆时代潮流而动的感伤主义，其实对现实来说是无力回天的。我不想做这种创作，说教了。
不新鮮故事發問：我們到底是需要朋友還是需要社交媒體..
“find me ”给我整哭了，孤独、童心永远可以共鸣，看了预告之后故事明晰但还是想看就是如此吧。虽说新兴元素的思考都是从前出现过的，后半截成改变世界多少也有些随意。而且六岁派对的朋友们的肤色真的很政治正确，（或许是我政治敏感）奶奶的身份安排也是个比较奇怪的点。
当看到罗恩耗尽最后的电量把小孩拖出森林的时候 联想到前面小孩本可以求救但为了罗恩选择躲藏 “友谊是双向的”大概就被完美诠释了
電影的前半段很精彩，節奏也好，但是後半段人物的態度變化有點突兀，反派太過臉譜化，羅恩是為交朋友而存在的，可它最後的確成了巴尼的朋友，機器人最大的功能是陪伴，而不是為了交朋友而交朋友吧，更不是犧牲吧，所以本片最不解的其實就是羅恩為什麽一定要消失才能拯救大家，為什麽最後不把羅恩的數據先備份，然後再上傳和原始程序融合，這樣羅恩就不用消失了，所以最後的強行煽情不太喜歡，也許動畫的情感設定和真實程序總是不同的吧。
交友工具反而让人为了赢得关注而更孤独
最后为什么要让一个小孩做那么艰难的选择，还是把我看哭了，小机器人和瓦力里面那个好像。
It's Mad Max meets Sesame Street, live streaming.
逻辑各种硬伤，剧情转折极硬，全片狂黑苹果和脸书，反派人物是照着库克画的吧……
又有趣又暖心，每一个社恐包括我应该都会想要一个Ron。就是第三幕角色和情节的bug都有点多外加强行催泪……但是反派角色真的不是在cue小扎吗哈哈哈哈他看完会不会很生气啊哈哈哈哈。这片可以和今年上半年的《智能大反攻》对比着看，殊途同归地走向了对机器/算法控制人类生活的反抗，最后的落点一个是家庭一个是朋友，很真谛了。
哈哈哈，这是个披着“友情片”的“讽刺恐怖片”吧….连忙把正对着自己的摄像头用胶带堵住了。太可怕了…衍生出“思想”人工智能超可怕的！🐶
结局的处理方式太怪了，正常不应该是让人放下机器跟现实的人做朋友吗，居然是优化机器让人能更好得跟机器做朋友，不可能每个人都喜欢小白这样的朋友，这很不合理
20220210
可能是假期三天断断续续才看完，不太连贯，感觉剧情走向有点突然。映射apple和人工智能还是很搞笑的。看到b-bot的瞬间觉得这不就是当代手机社交软件现状吗！
模仿了大白，讽刺了库克。主意不错，编剧一般。
前 90% 很棒，最后 10% 突然崩坏。我以为自己已经宽容到什么狗设定都吃得下了，没想到，一个 AI 已经商用的世界里，上传居然会抹掉本地数据？这不是上传，这是赛博上吊。
比预想的要好看，故事还是那个套路，但这个迷你版大白太有灵气了，邪门又好笑，而且还坚持给自己戴土气的羊毛帽子。在无所事事的夜晚值得一看。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
