Exploring the role and symbolic meaning of the Crown Jewels in the centuries-old coronation ceremony, The Coronation shows these objects of astonishing beauty in new high-resolution footage. The film tells the extraordinary story of St Edward's Crown, which was destroyed after the English Civil War and remade for the Coronation of Charles II in 1661. It has only been worn by Her Majesty once, at the moment she was crowned.
On 2 June 1953, on one of the coldest June days of the century and after 16 months of planning, The Queen set out from Buckingham Palace to be crowned at Westminster Abbey, watched by millions of people throughout the world. A ceremony dating back more than a thousand years was to mark the dawn of a new Elizabethan age.
Viewing both private and official film footage, The Queen recalls the day when the weight of both St Edward's Crown and the hopes and expectations of a country recovering from war were on her shoulders, as the nation looked to their 27 year-old Queen to lead them into a new era.
In the film, The Queen says: 「I've seen one Coronation, and been the recipient in the other, which is pretty remarkable.」
For audiences unfamiliar with the story of the Crown Jewels and the regalia, the film explains their contemporary relevance to the UK as a nation and to the enduring purpose and the work of monarchy. They are symbols of the relationship between the Sovereign and the people, and the duties and responsibilities of leadership.
The film also features eyewitness accounts of those who participated in the 1953 Coronation, including a maid of honour who nearly fainted in the Abbey, and a 12 year-old choirboy who was left to sing solo when his overwhelmed colleagues lost their voices.
全片看完不知意义何在。又不是2037年，竟然有人给这个题材投钱。英德两国年轻一代演员真是要颜值没颜值要演技没演技。全靠艾恩斯、迪赫这群爷叔撑着。我就是冲爷叔们来的。迪赫随便演个配角就很抓人。我还串戏串在他的《包豪斯时代》。再说剧情，这是走微观史学之路么？编也编得用点心，在牛津念个德语系，改天两个人就知道了天机，只可惜没有签字权，不然要怎样？不是洗白张伯伦，而是所有决策都是不完全信息下的零和博弈，说白了就是赌博。即使张伯伦当时作出相反的决策，结果也只是战争早一年到来，也许英国也跟法国一样在战争初期就那么投降了。一切马后炮都是耍流氓。
火柴棒对水龙头，恰似对你的温柔。
“我们无法选择自己生活的时代，我们唯一的选择就是如何回应”
难以形容的mix：战狼+叶问+手撕鬼子+塞尔达无双+这就是街舞
看有一条评论说，我们的历史教科书是毛子的史观？绥靖政策是合理必要的？那课本中的苏德互不侵犯条约呢？建议回炉重新接受义务教育。
Spy thriller 的紧张感拉满，观影感受💯
看完后觉得印度阅兵也不是那么荒谬了，毕竟电影里两个人就有一台坦克的战斗力……
阿三的抗英神剧，延续了阿三电影反牛顿的设定，两个胡子大叔徒手擒虎单手扔摩托都不在话下，动作场面十分火爆，激烈的鼓点听得让人热血沸腾，不得不说阿三的神剧还是很有看头的，特别是这部戏的插曲都很好听，让我这一贯不怎么喜欢阿三的歌舞的人都耐着性子看完了这三个小时的电影。
但有意思的事这些矛盾点又让他如此吸引人
我尼玛，三哥牛逼，印度神片在场面、编剧、配乐上都再上一个台阶，好家伙，看得太欢乐了，还要啥逻辑要啥科学要啥自行车啊！
张伯伦为欧战赢得了时间？难道德国不也多准备了一年？要这么说，如果战争再迟一些爆发，是不是德国就先拥有核武？洗地不是这样洗的~
还有一个我很不理解的一点，我不明白为什么他们对于一些问题回答直接用那种奇怪的摇头方式…真的太难受了…
虽然德国小哥更帅，但是我真的太喜欢George Mackay了！
正史中描写虚拟人物的故事。也许并不假，只是未被看到并写出。剧情并不需要如此叨叨唠唠的。有点长了。
不愧是德国人，不愧是马克思的诞生地😭——哲学家总想着怎么解释世界，而真正重要的是改变世界
两个印度半神手撕英国鬼子
不要看历史怎么样，就从电影出发，我觉得蛮精彩的。
节奏很好， 导演很逊，歌曲好听。电影主旨是为张伯伦洗白？当年丘吉尔怎样在Hause里苦口婆心地希望大家看到希特勒狼子野心的？可是都被一张薄薄的慕尼黑条约蒙了眼睛！
有點誇張，那有要送機密文件到處跑沒人管的。
今天看这部电影给人以强烈的政治现实感。当年由德英法意四国首脑签署的《慕尼黑协议》，同意割让捷克的苏台德领土给德国。英首相张伯伦的绥靖政策并没有阻止Hitler 的扩张野心，协议只维持了一年，战争爆发。最近的俄乌之战，Putin又是个什么gui呢？
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
