A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
挺规整的商业片，飞机上降落那场戏还是挺激动人心的
少了点精彩刺激，剧情有点硬，还行吧。总觉得荷兰弟打着打着就得整点蛛丝吊在天棚上。不过能看
为男主怒加一星 我是头一回见着这么完美的男主 全是优点挑不出毛病的那种 现实中肯定不存在 人类的创作里也极少有这样的吧 看到前面我一直在想这男的怕不是那方面有点问题吧 所以才对女主这么好 长的不赖 有自己的事业 生活在那样一个年代 却从来没看低女主的出身 女主逃他也给她选择的自由 多次救赎她 善解人意 乐于助人 宽容善良 深情专一 哪怕女主不能生孩子他也接受 苦等女主好几年 优点根本数不完 这片宗教意味挺浓的 女主因为童年遭遇起初不信上帝 最后祈求主的帮助才脱离苦海 所以这真的是因为女主过的太惨 上帝看不下去了派来天使拯救她的吧 所以道理就是你信就能得救？怪不得男主人设这么好 感情他的设定就是一个上帝派来救赎他人的角色吧
之前看说很烂降低了预期 但其实是合格的寻宝片 节奏节凑 气氛也不错 如果能在电影院看会再加一星 希望索尼好好搞游戏影视化 到时候把美国末日也搞起来
因为没有玩过游戏，所以没什么共鸣。精神小伙完全不喜欢，剧情又很跳脱，很多东西在游戏里可以理解，但展现在电影里就有点... ...不少地方的特效也有些敷衍。
这片子就是给平时压抑久了想发泄下，哭的稀里哗啦看的，内容不能太当真。
没有玩过游戏，但高空飞落紧急开伞、古老宝藏钥匙、利益分赃不均、团队精神等要素和剧情加在一起就有点赶工意味……
某天我看了1个多小时，我都提不起兴趣，哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈。后来就关了。。
理解了为什么有人称荷兰弟是21世纪的阿汤哥，或许是多少相似的体格和形态以及关于IP展开的时而扑街时而大爆的福分与限制。整体像是在动作与解谜上低配的《古墓丽影》但也有更多可能性和这个时代的有趣场景。反派女还是《安眠书店》第三季的YOU哎！麻烦出下第二部谢谢！
及格线作品，还比不上成龙的《飞鹰计划》，真希望所有人都去玩一次《神秘海域4》
荷兰弟这些年逐渐陷入瓶颈期了，出演的角色青春有余，尺度不足，太素。
一部“成龙”电影。双男主设计没有化学反应，全片就是二男二女不断反转背叛。真是可惜了班达拉斯要陪着演这么无脑的故事，还草草下场。荷兰弟真的是作为好莱坞不高不帅的年轻男演员，一边保持着他“嘴里塞青蛙”的表演状态，一边更添几分油腻。
爆米花电影，轻松愉快。寻宝套路虽老但爽。就是选角不太喜欢，nathan喜欢的那个女的我还以为四十好几了……
一部“成龙”电影。双男主设计没有化学反应，全片就是二男二女不断反转背叛。真是可惜了班达拉斯要陪着演这么无脑的故事，还草草下场。荷兰弟真的是作为好莱坞不高不帅的年轻男演员，一边保持着他“嘴里塞青蛙”的表演状态，一边更添几分油腻。
多给一星给情怀，说实话，游戏改编的电影有这个还原度我已经很满意了，特别是主题曲一响起来的时候，回忆满满。
每一份真情里都有谎言，每一份假意里也有真心，这一时的缠绵抵不了那一时的渴，因为那些百转千回，都要像叹气一般轻轻放下，勿求甚解才好…百转千回绕指柔，终遇良人长相守，我们明知这是俗套，我们深知这也是解药，嗯
非游戏党表示Just so-so。健身大王荷兰弟，存在感微弱的女主，以及年度最拉反派。前戏非常平庸，主创的着力点都放在高潮的飞机和船戏上了......标准的流水线动作A片。
幼稚，草率，乏善可陈，就这索尼还磨了这么多年，全是徒劳无功
假，真假……看了半天找不到好的托辞觉着还是个假字了得。没有了小时候观看类似题材电影时的紧迫紧张的感觉，成人的感官会随着年龄的增长变得愈加迟钝看来是真的，不然为啥很多贰佰伍貌似无故要寻求所谓的刺激？！编剧在解密情节上基本就没下功夫，全是胡编乱造糊弄人，本来是核心的反派也死的不知所云，拍的非常一般。
难得是个黑人女反派。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
