Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
三星给美女，太漂亮了！一星给男演员——完全分辩不出区别，除了李光洙。
只是为了韩志旼姐姐看的，不能多给我姐姐一点镜头吗。电影真的很无趣很套路，林允儿喜欢一个废物呵呵
与其说相信灵魂伴侣，不如说修行到一定境界，可以百搭了
我是为数不多觉得这电影还不错的吗哈哈哈哈哈
其实讲的有点点混乱 同样的场景衣服 突然就换了伴侣 换了另一种可能229
讲述了四个单身朋友以不同的组合成为情侣的故事，
插曲都很好听，剧情…很无语，轻快合家欢≠浮皮潦草不过脑
跨年夜的环球影城和新荣记希望有人替我爱你。
开年头一部电影，是这样的喜乐会，虽是絮叨老套，可，人世间的美好不正如此么…🥃
冲着林允儿去看的，结果电影快结束了才出来。整个电影就是一个酒店的各个人物自己的单线拼凑在一起，而且很俗套的是每个人都给分配对象，酒店经理暗恋十几年的朋友结婚了当天就给安排了一个相亲男医生，酒店BOSS不知道怎么回事就是爱上了保洁女孩，新年老妈因为下雪顺利和初恋老门童在一起了，求死的顾客也和接线员在一起了。
无脑暖暖小电影，看完就觉得全世界除了我都很幸福hhh
应个景 在2021年最后一天看了这部 故事情节太粗糙了只能说 看在喜欢的演员份上给三星😂
比想像中好看～最喜歡姜河那和Yoona的故事線；李光洙和徐康俊的Bromance很好笑；老年CP很感動；韓志旼和李陣郁的Love line戲份不多有點可惜；李棟旭和元真兒的Love line很奇怪...
我爱演员阵容，可是剧情好散啊…感觉更像看了一部酒店宣传片…
2021依然是狗屎，想对度过这一年的所有人说一句，辛苦了。
《新年快乐(2021)》 （2022.1.8） 5
无聊，平淡，不浪漫，没感到温馨。
很有创意的一个对于“灵魂伴侣”的探究，怎样的组合才能走到最后：势均力敌，趣味相投 VS 截然不同，冲突很多，却能够相互更加包容。好像没有必要去考究，因为无论怎样的组合，都是需要去经营，只是与不同的人 会有不同的相处模式。
冲卡司去的。结果太过无聊和凌乱看到一半弃。
喜欢这种《真爱至上》类的多线叙事的群星拼盘节日温情电影，今晚看这个可真应景，去年这时候看了韩国一部《新年前夜》，满世界演，今年这部故事浓缩到一间酒店，从平安夜到圣诞到跨年到新年，什么元素都有了，但综合起来一句话总结:林允儿靠美貌和笑容救下一个寻死的屌丝。新年快乐！！！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
