Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
三星不足，个人不喜欢这种扯上种族歧视的都市传说。很想劝句男主，被蜜蜂蛰了就去医院看看吧
还不如舞女大盗呢☹️ 期待了这么久，太平庸了
不知是否因为有续集企划，但现在看完就像听了一个讲到一半的故事，有点难受。要政治正确和种族议题没毛病，但还是应该先拍的好看才行。
作为恐怖片，气氛上弱了点，但思想性不错，基本承接老版，让candyman成为弱者反抗的一个icon～
预告片积攒的期待值前十分钟被耗完。
jlo个人秀，故事很假，男主角格格不入越看越像川宝
还能看，两位老将，尤其女生保养得太好啦吧，男二要比她小二十多岁啊看不出来。女主的经纪人这位英国喜剧男星，减肥了不太好玩了嘿嘿
比较平淡的爱情向电影，虽然剧情设置上一点也不“平淡”，独立女明星+平民理工男的幻想。结尾有点仓促。
拍给美国黑人和白左看的电影。我举双手赞成美国黑人对美国白人的反攻倒算，但影片本身嘛，嘿嘿，是真的烂！
看了感觉就像一部明星真人秀节目用了个十分烂俗的剧情，而不像一部爱情喜剧。举个例子：就好像李玟用的是想不嫁给外遇男歌星的天后人设、黄渤用的学校老师、单亲爸爸的人设，然后给他们搞CP，用明星体验普通人生活那样演，一看就是导演组安排好的。在真人秀算乐呵，但按电影角色来说却不能与角色共情。
大部分黑人的电影是不是最后都要扯到平权上？
建议看滴曼加入黑豹党，视觉效果不错，剧情莫名其妙
5.5/10，糖果人？蜜蜂人！直面社会议题总是要点赞的，镜中杀人的空间玩得也比较新奇，但是基本设定和背景故事讲不清楚的情况下，想要戳破种族矛盾的利刃也只能流传为都市传说，被当做玩笑罢了。
우리 오왼 오빠 바보 아니에요ㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠ @Omniplex RM
能把这么有意思的偶像剧设定拍得这么难看也是一种本事
很像没文化版的美国诺丁山，看回海报还是惊呼当场结婚的剧情：甘都得？！owen wilson的鼻子在海报上也好像p正了
只要仔细研究问题答案就会自然而然出现。 歌曲好听。
3.5 虽然oldfashion但是看这谁要动脑子呢
广影 歌曲不错，洛佩兹是巨星，欧文却显得不太入戏。
算是当代诺丁山，从其中女明星的形象变换倒能看出些时代里价值观的变化。女明星结过三次婚，前夫有过艳照门，现任又和助理出轨，但她还是一心向爱。虽然故事浅薄得经不住考究，但是看看J Lo大秀舞台和变装还是有点意思。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
