Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
特效质量风格不连贯，文戏注水严重节奏混乱人物散乱，情节过于套路毫无新意
互联网巨头拍的轻喜剧，内容自然要赞颂互联网商业模式。
有一说一艾默里奇“毁人不倦”脑洞确实是可以的，穿越月球部分看着还行了， 但是地球灾难部分就太陈词滥调了
有些想法设定还是不错，但是这剧情也太“自我复制”了吧，剧情上的想象力全无。
没看过剧版 但是这个看得还算欢乐 互联网 咸鱼什么的太有趣了。首先这个故事架构完整 两个人重逢 然后教导男的做生意 产生情愫 最后抢婚 在制作不算精良的整条线中整个脉络让人清清楚楚 起码不油腻。这个女主看着挺舒服的 但这男的似乎有意让他显得太无能——现在的社会性别敏感 对于这样的性别差别对待还是会害怕 夸一方就会引起另一方的不满 希望编剧不要搞事情。最喜欢的其实还是里面的人的口音 甜儿 牙签儿 小汤圆儿 哎呀 广东人表示这些儿化音真的太好听太喜欢了！PS买橘子那一段真的可以不要 恶搞这个不好。
及格之作，5.5的评分过低了。虽然不乏幼稚幼稚的设定和硬凹的感情线还有那突兀的中国交换生情节，但是也有扎实绚丽的科幻画面和异想的巨型架构设想也是能及格的。
感觉感情线写的还蛮爽的，谁不想和貌美大小姐谈恋爱呢？尤其女主还这么漂亮，这个感情线还挺带感。
山姆再次拯救世界。拍的没有以前2012和后天好看。
中规中矩，还得月球内部那段比较能看。不过想法还行，真希望月球有她自己的意识～
科幻设定不讲基本法就很灾难，很难看…… 靠男女主的脸撑着看完了。
这不是灾难片，这是灾难的片。别不信，罗兰艾默里奇竟然能把自己降到了和毕志飞一样的水准。天文奇观和巨大物体爱好者们，请放弃一切期待，没有一个特效镜头是能让你看爽的。没有一个概念设计不是偷来的，吞进去后以更荒谬的样子拉出来。面对拍得只像鸟巢那么大的月球内部，我的表情不是冷漠，而是瞌睡。我希望本片所有赞助商都能抵制和制裁罗兰艾默里奇，因为他以摧枯拉朽之势侵犯了烂片的国度。我也真不知道，所有本片的参与者看到自己名字在片尾升起时，会以什么样的表情面对，用上海话讲，大概是叫“嚓污米孔”。
所以其实月球不是月球，而是人类祖先派出来的星际飞船么，我去，这脑洞有点牛的
古代婚恋市场这个设定也太新奇了，感觉编剧的小脑瓜里都是些奇奇怪怪的东西呢，男主演得也不错。
带资进组的角色一律太尬。
一开始的太空事故之后，剧情就像窜稀一样引进了十几个角色，什么配角，配角的妈，男主角的儿子，儿子的律师，儿子的法官，男主角的前妻，前妻的丈夫，女主角的前夫，以及女主角的儿子等等等等。。。还有为什么要问欧洲借飞船，还不是你漂亮国NASA根本搞不出来，还有脸和总统说，呸
这哪是灾难片，分明是怪兽片……艾默里奇也开始走这种无聊的路子了，全剧几乎只有最后十分钟看着有点意思。
AI:关我屁事。另外哈利贝瑞和于文文，真的不是一对儿吗
把《赘婿》第一部中的喜剧元素放大升级：今为古用+神经喜剧。这次没有「耶利哥之墙」，但把「落跑新娘」的桥段拍了，非常《一夜风流》
很显然，在地球上制造灾难已经无法满足艾默里奇了
每个演员似乎心里都在想：“赶紧拍完，各回各家”
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
